WM. We strive to avoid judgment and instead adopt a compassionate perspective when working with prisoners, focusing on what is necessary for their successful reintegration into society.
One of the fundamentals of Hoogstraten is that you have to work and participate in an education programme. Recently, we have had less people wanting to work despite having more connections with outside organisations. Instances of drug use are increasing as well. Our policy is to send the prisoner back to an ordinary prison after being caught twice with drugs. Some of the people I send to do a job have to end their contract early because of their behaviour. Before, we had the luxury of an observation period of two months, the process was more gradual. Now, with people coming in and out all the time, everything goes faster, and activities and follow-ups are not adapted. These factors are all detrimental to our regime and our principles. So we need to strike a balance in relation to these changes. However, from speaking with colleagues in the closed prisons of Wortel, Merkplas and Turnhout, I can see that these developments are happening everywhere, so it is not just an open prison issue.
PC. It is really important to understand that a lot of people who commit offenses often have low self-esteem. They do not believe in themselves and have had lots of problems in their past. With time, they begin to see themselves the way community sees them: bad people who cannot and will never contribute anything of value to society.
We made a choice not to be solely risk-focused in our rehabilitation programmes. We’ve implemented the “Good Lives Model” developed by Tony Ward, a New Zealand professor. He developed an approach to interacting with prisoners that considers not only their risk factors but also their strengths and aspirations in life. In fact, if you look at the risk principle, you are always focusing on negative aspects, whereas if you look at what the prisoners want to achieve, their response is going to be much more positive. In our philosophy, we look at both angles. If inmates say they need help, a detention officer will help them, but it is not our aim to systematically accompany them.
One of our residents initially struggled to connect with others due to past trauma. To help him regain confidence, the staff identified his strengths and offered him a job. However, he found it challenging to adapt, so a detention officer accompanied him until he became comfortable. This support enabled him to excel in his work and avoid potential relapses into criminal behaviour. Now, every time he does something new, an officer will accompany him the first time to put him at ease. Once he is settled, he becomes very much independent. This example illustrates how someone could have easily ended back up in prison without the proper approach. We really have to read between the lines.
Another example is a long-term inmate we had who was addicted to Methadone. The staff successfully helped him overcome drug addiction and enrolled him in a skills programme. He secured a job selling house materials online and impressed his employers, resulting in a permanent contract. The bosses even gave him necessary furniture to get settled into his new apartment. The recognition he received for his work in detention played a crucial role in his recovery, as he no longer desired or needed drugs. When he was released, he asked me if he could come back from time to time and participate in some activities. By keeping people like him close, they set an example for those serving their sentence, and that is something I want to keep doing. Normally, a governor is expected not to stay close to prisoners after their release. But this principle has its limits… Being present and providing assistance is crucial in ensuring humane treatment for them. And I am positive it reduces their risk of relapse.