EZ. A focus of the visit was to examine the situation of prisoners placed under a restricted regime for protection or security reasons. Restricted regimes are of particular concern to the CPT, as they may lead to additional punishments with a greater risk of inhuman treatments. The main consideration in that field regards the Irish Prison Service policy on the abolition of solitary confinement and its genuine effort to ensure that all prisoners are offered at least two hours of out-of-cell time. Restricted places can hold challenging prisoners. It is a place where a combination of mental health issues can be found and coexist. It is a place of confusion, where protection could be mixed with discipline. For example, despite new procedures introduced in April 2019 to clarify the use of Close Supervision and Safety Observation Cells, their purpose is still unclear.
In all these regimes we met the same problem: a de facto situation of solitary confinement with inmates locked alone for more than 22 hours. A prisoner we met in Midlands prison said that he was hearing voices and had not been provided with his medication when placed in a restricted regime. For weeks, he was allowed out of his cell for only 20 minutes a day to shower and clean his cell. He was not offered any activities (gym, school, library). He had been declining the additional 20 minutes in the yard that he was offered three times a week and, therefore, spent 23 and a half hours a day locked in his cell.
Other people incarcerated at Cloverhill prison were placed in Safety Observation Cells while waiting for an admission at the Central Mental Hospital. In these SOC, one man was lying naked in his cell. The walls were smeared with faeces and there were puddles of urine on the floor. There were no blankets in the cell and his poncho, lying next to him, was soaked in urine. Prison officers explained that the door was only opened using the protection of a shield to pass him food. During his time in the cell, he had not been provided with a shower or let out of the cell. Other prisoners were found in similar situations that, for the CPT, might amount to inhuman and degrading treatment.
We also visited National Violence Reduction Units, recently opened to provide a more effective management of the small number of “high-risk violent and disruptive” prisoners. During the visit, the two prisoners with whom the delegation spoke both had their hands cuffed in front of their body before the inner grating in their cell was unlocked.
They were surprised to have these barriers removed and to have a face-to-face encounter with CPT delegation members. We discovered that even consultations with doctors happened through the barred hatch and that a blood sample had been taken through the bars while handcuffed.
A lot should be done to put the administration’s positive vision into practice. It should start by recording the out-of-cell time of persons placed under restricted regimes, implementing reviewing procedures for these regimes and reconciling legitimate security requirements with the CPT standards.