GD. We recommend first removing some powers from the prison administration. They should no longer be in charge of health. This competence should fall under the authority of the Ministry of Health, and education should be entrusted to the Ministry of Education. Each sentence execution judge should have a multidisciplinary team in charge of post-sentencing expertise so that it’s no longer managed solely by the prison administration. The latter is known to have refused a prisoner’s freedom for saying one wrong word.
On the other hand, the concept of the Patronato de Liberados, the body of the Ministry of Justice that drafts the expertises, should be reviewed. It should be called Oficina de ayuda al preso (Prisoner Aid Office), for example.
Prison security personnel should be trained in accordance with international recommendations. They’re currently following the directives of a prison administration that rules as if in a time of dictatorship. The country’s prison administration is a resurgence of the military era.
Finally, we recommend the systematic use of electronic bracelets for house arrest pending trial. It’s a way to save public money, avoid pre-trial detention and allow the defendants to stay with their relatives and continue their commitments before trial.
We’ve learned, however, that the previous government contracted out the supply of electronic bracelets and monitors to a private company. Up until December 2019, it was costing the State a million pesos a day. This also poses an ethical problem: when someone is deprived of their freedom, they’re at the disposal of the State and the courts. Prison management should be fully public.